[108945] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] <> continued

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Cote)
Tue Jan 31 19:35:51 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHgxQO30X-0+u3W5B_KZoRVK_cTEq8ZFyJW-tsbojyqVE_KmmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Cote <wearetheinformation00@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:19:02 -0500
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============1925546316952601329==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11426c845dee7505476c2882

--001a11426c845dee7505476c2882
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

While reconsidering this sentence:
{'ej not bIQ'a' qoDDaq lengchu'be}
/and he had never actually traveled around it/
I realized that the English translation is a little dubious.
The German uses "durchfahren" which means to "travel
through" in the sense of to "travel through (a tunnel)"
or "pass (beneath a bridge."

And so, I came up with:

{'ej not bIQ'a' qoD(Daq) chIqchu'}

and/or

{'ej bIQ'a' qoDDaq ghaHtaHvIS poSayDon'e',
not lengchu'}

The second sentence seems very clunky to me, although
I'm not sure if the first one is correct grammar-wise.

Second question: {legh} v {leghpu'}. In the story the only
chance Poseidon will get to travel the oceans is in the far
future, in a mythical End of Times. Although for the purposes
of the story, it _is_ treated like a historical fact. So, my question
is: can you use {leghpu'} if the event it's referring to (the event
that brings the hypothetical into the historical) will happen far,
far in the future?

QImSIr

--001a11426c845dee7505476c2882
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>While reconsidering this sentence:=C2=A0</div><div>{&#39;ej not bIQ&#3=
9;a&#39; qoDDaq lengchu&#39;be}</div><div>/and he had never actually travel=
ed around it/</div><div>I realized that the English translation is a little=
 dubious.=C2=A0</div><div>The German uses &quot;durchfahren&quot; which mea=
ns to &quot;travel=C2=A0</div><div>through&quot; in the sense of to &quot;t=
ravel through (a tunnel)&quot;=C2=A0</div><div>or &quot;pass (beneath a bri=
dge.&quot;</div><div><br></div><div>And so, I came up with:</div><div><br><=
/div><div>{&#39;ej not bIQ&#39;a&#39; qoD(Daq) chIqchu&#39;}</div><div><br>=
</div><div>and/or=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>{&#39;ej bIQ&#39;a&#39; qo=
DDaq ghaHtaHvIS poSayDon&#39;e&#39;,=C2=A0</div><div>not lengchu&#39;}</div=
><div><br></div><div>The second sentence seems very clunky to me, although=
=C2=A0</div><div>I&#39;m not sure if the first one is correct grammar-wise.=
=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Second question: {legh} v {leghpu&#39;}. In=
 the story the only=C2=A0</div><div>chance Poseidon will get to travel the =
oceans is in the far=C2=A0</div><div>future, in a mythical End of Times. Al=
though for the purposes=C2=A0</div><div>of the story, it _is_ treated like =
a historical fact. So, my question=C2=A0</div><div>is: can you use {leghpu&=
#39;} if the event it&#39;s referring to (the event=C2=A0</div><div>that br=
ings the hypothetical into the historical) will happen far,=C2=A0</div><div=
>far in the future?=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>QImSIr</div><div><br></d=
iv>

--001a11426c845dee7505476c2882--

--===============1925546316952601329==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============1925546316952601329==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post