[108558] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] {-lIvIS}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ed Bailey)
Fri Dec 23 08:07:38 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLWrQcU+Tseje59r=4vGuZwX_tce=Fw37OAs=DjSOdSCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ed Bailey <bellerophon.modeler@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:07:34 -0500
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============4659728885841633346==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11467d66c6443a0544531182
--001a11467d66c6443a0544531182
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> but as you cleverly pointed out, there is a problem with the placement
> of {-neS}. If I want to say "while you were doing me the honor of
> being present", then is the {bISaHtaHneSvIS} correct ?
There's no rule against it. I was just supposing. But I'm pretty sure there
is no canon example of any suffix occurring between {-taH} and {-vIS}. I
can only speak for myself, but I expect for most {-neS} would seem like a
weird interruption, and if {-neS} were called for, would add it to the main
clause instead. (As for rovers, does anyone even have a definite idea what
effect {-qu'} or {-be'} would have following {-taH}?)
~mIp'av
--001a11467d66c6443a0544531182
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun=
@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
but as you cleverly pointed out, there is a problem with the placement<br>
of {-neS}. If I want to say "while you were doing me the honor of<br>
being present", then is the {bISaHtaHneSvIS} correct ?</blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>There's no rule against it. I was just supposing. But =
I'm pretty sure there is no canon example of any suffix occurring betwe=
en {-taH} and {-vIS}. I can only speak for myself, but I expect for most {-=
neS} would seem like a weird interruption, and if {-neS} were called for, w=
ould add it to the main clause instead. (As for rovers, does anyone even ha=
ve a definite idea what effect {-qu'} or {-be'} would have followin=
g {-taH}?)<br><br></div><div>~mIp'av <br></div></div></div></div>
--001a11467d66c6443a0544531182--
--===============4659728885841633346==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============4659728885841633346==--
