[108488] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] paq'batlh mu'tlhegh

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Mon Dec 19 05:57:41 2016

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2c+JWczGF9AKR95C2Mqagkxa-qOjB7n_auXEymdWf8RrYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:57:37 +0200
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============0509066376103551098==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e56fcb2e9fd054400c983

--001a114e56fcb2e9fd054400c983
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

and perhaps this explanation is compatible with the tkd sentence
{jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'}.

"I don't know the here (=3DI don't know what/where is this "here") which I =
am
being (=3Doccupying)".

qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 19 Dec 2016 12:53 pm, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

> this just occured to me..
>
> paq'batlh doesn't have punctuation, right ? so, what if at the original
> sentence the punctuation goes:
>
> {DaH, naDev, jIHtaHbogh meq Saja'}
>
> if that would be the case, I could accept this as "now, here, I will tell
> you my reason of being".
>
> granted, perhaps this produces a different meaning than the given one, bu=
t
> its the only solution I can think of.
>
> damn, this sentence drives me crazy !
>
> qunnoH jan puqloD
> ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
>
> On 19 Dec 2016 11:36 am, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> De'vID:
>> > {naDev ghaHtaH} means "he/she is here".
>>
>> Yes, I can understand this; but if at the above sentence we had the
>> {-bogh} ({naDev ghaHtaHbogh}), then what would that mean ?
>>
>> My difficulty in understanding the original paq'batlh sentence,
>> had/has to do with accepting the {naDev jIHtaHbogh} as a noun.
>>
>> If that sentence went: {DaH naDev jIHtaH meq Saja'}, then I could read
>> it as "now, the reason of my being here, I will tell you". But the
>> addition of {-bogh} severely messes me up. It is its presence that I
>> can't explain.
>>
>> qunnoH jan puqloD
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:51 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Dec 17, 2016 09:24, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > De'vID:
>> >
>> >> {naDev jIHtaHbogh} is a noun.
>> >
>> > I can't understand how this could be correct as a {-bogh}ed noun.
>> >
>> > I know we can say {paq qanobta'bogh} for "the book which I gave you".
>> but
>> > here the {paq} is the object of {nob}.
>> >
>> > On the {naDev jIHtaHbogh} is the {naDev} an object ? and if yes, the
>> object
>> > of what verb ? the object of {jIH} ? I can understand the {jIH} taking
>> an
>> > object in the context of {SuvwI' jIH}. but then, the {naDev jIHtaH}
>> would
>> > mean "I am here" not in the sense "I am present here", but in the sens=
e
>> "I
>> > am the here".
>> >
>> > The SkyBox {Qo'noS} card has the following sentence:
>> > {pa=E2=80=99 =E2=80=99oH=C2=ADtaH vaS=C2=AD=E2=80=99a=E2=80=99 =E2=80=
=99e=E2=80=99.}
>> > "This is where the Klingon Great Hall is located"
>> >
>> > That no more means "the Great Hall is 'the there'" than {naDev jIHtaH}
>> means
>> > "I am 'the here'."
>> >
>> > The suffix {-taH} indicates an ongoing activity, and "being at a
>> location"
>> > is apparently considered a type of ongoing activity.
>> >
>> > See also KGT p.25:
>> > {tera'ngan ghaH qama''e'} "The prisoner is a Terran"
>> > {bIghHa'Daq ghaHtaH qama''e'} "The prisoner is in the prison"
>> >
>> > Even though that sentence has a {-Daq}ed noun, the structure is
>> essentially
>> > the same. {bIghHa'Daq ghaHtaH} means "he/she is in prison", and {naDev
>> > ghaHtaH} means "he/she is here".
>> >
>> > --
>> > De'vID
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> > tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
>> > http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>> >
>>
>

--001a114e56fcb2e9fd054400c983
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">and perhaps this explanation is compatible with the tkd sent=
ence {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe&#39;}.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">&quot;I don&#39;t know the here (=3DI don&#39;t know what/wh=
ere is this &quot;here&quot;) which I am being (=3Doccupying)&quot;.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
ghoghwIj HablI&#39;vo&#39; vIngeHta&#39;</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 19 Dec 2016 12=
:53 pm, &quot;mayqel qunenoS&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com"=
>mihkoun@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr">this just occured to me..</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">paq&#39;batlh doesn&#39;t have punctuation, right ? so, what=
 if at the original sentence the punctuation goes:</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">{DaH, naDev, jIHtaHbogh meq Saja&#39;}</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">if that would be the case, I could accept this as &quot;now,=
 here, I will tell you my reason of being&quot;.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">granted, perhaps this produces a different meaning than the =
given one, but its the only solution I can think of.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">damn, this sentence drives me crazy !</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
ghoghwIj HablI&#39;vo&#39; vIngeHta&#39;</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 19 Dec 2016 11=
:36 am, &quot;mayqel qunenoS&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com"=
 target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">De&#39;vID:<br>
&gt; {naDev ghaHtaH} means &quot;he/she is here&quot;.<br>
<br>
Yes, I can understand this; but if at the above sentence we had the<br>
{-bogh} ({naDev ghaHtaHbogh}), then what would that mean ?<br>
<br>
My difficulty in understanding the original paq&#39;batlh sentence,<br>
had/has to do with accepting the {naDev jIHtaHbogh} as a noun.<br>
<br>
If that sentence went: {DaH naDev jIHtaH meq Saja&#39;}, then I could read<=
br>
it as &quot;now, the reason of my being here, I will tell you&quot;. But th=
e<br>
addition of {-bogh} severely messes me up. It is its presence that I<br>
can&#39;t explain.<br>
<br>
qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
<br>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:51 AM, De&#39;vID &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:de.vid.j=
onpin@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<b=
r>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Dec 17, 2016 09:24, &quot;mayqel qunenoS&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailt=
o:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; De&#39;vID:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; {naDev jIHtaHbogh} is a noun.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I can&#39;t understand how this could be correct as a {-bogh}ed noun.<=
br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I know we can say {paq qanobta&#39;bogh} for &quot;the book which I ga=
ve you&quot;. but<br>
&gt; here the {paq} is the object of {nob}.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On the {naDev jIHtaHbogh} is the {naDev} an object ? and if yes, the o=
bject<br>
&gt; of what verb ? the object of {jIH} ? I can understand the {jIH} taking=
 an<br>
&gt; object in the context of {SuvwI&#39; jIH}. but then, the {naDev jIHtaH=
} would<br>
&gt; mean &quot;I am here&quot; not in the sense &quot;I am present here&qu=
ot;, but in the sense &quot;I<br>
&gt; am the here&quot;.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The SkyBox {Qo&#39;noS} card has the following sentence:<br>
&gt; {pa=E2=80=99 =E2=80=99oH=C2=ADtaH vaS=C2=AD=E2=80=99a=E2=80=99 =E2=80=
=99e=E2=80=99.}<br>
&gt; &quot;This is where the Klingon Great Hall is located&quot;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; That no more means &quot;the Great Hall is &#39;the there&#39;&quot; t=
han {naDev jIHtaH} means<br>
&gt; &quot;I am &#39;the here&#39;.&quot;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The suffix {-taH} indicates an ongoing activity, and &quot;being at a =
location&quot;<br>
&gt; is apparently considered a type of ongoing activity.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; See also KGT p.25:<br>
&gt; {tera&#39;ngan ghaH qama&#39;&#39;e&#39;} &quot;The prisoner is a Terr=
an&quot;<br>
&gt; {bIghHa&#39;Daq ghaHtaH qama&#39;&#39;e&#39;} &quot;The prisoner is in=
 the prison&quot;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Even though that sentence has a {-Daq}ed noun, the structure is essent=
ially<br>
&gt; the same. {bIghHa&#39;Daq ghaHtaH} means &quot;he/she is in prison&quo=
t;, and {naDev<br>
&gt; ghaHtaH} means &quot;he/she is here&quot;.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --<br>
&gt; De&#39;vID<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
&gt; tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" target=3D"_blank">tlhIng=
an-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=
=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tl=
hingan-hol-kli.org</a><br>
&gt;<br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>

--001a114e56fcb2e9fd054400c983--

--===============0509066376103551098==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============0509066376103551098==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post