[108377] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Because of the ... which it ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Tue Dec 13 08:59:25 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2c+68JRu61F0gKnfXAmGSfVctc=MCy0TzjQRhFz6YyWbZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:59:20 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 13 December 2016 at 11:54, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> De'vID:
>> Why do you need both {-'e'} and {-mo'}? Why is {-mo'} by itself not sufficient?
>
> I didn't know that !
>
> So, if I correctly understand your point, if I write {bortaSmo'
> chIwbogh tIghvam} this would mean "because of the revenge this custom
> epitomizes", right ?
What else could it mean?
This is ambiguous:
{SuvwI' qIpbogh yaS} "the officer who hit the warrior" or "the warrior
who was hit by the officer"
Now look at the following:
{SuvwI'mo' qIpbogh yaS}
{SuvwI' qIpbogh yaSmo'}
Are these ambiguous?
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
