[108326] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] How do you explain {'InSong} ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Sat Dec 10 05:27:51 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <f6277903-b920-4063-21eb-c661f4e7edce@gmx.de>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:27:47 +0200
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============4771301955031631056==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140fd5871964105434b52f4
--001a1140fd5871964105434b52f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
lieven:
> '-I-n = C-V-C
> S-o-ng = C-V-C
> Why the confusion?
according to the rule of cvc, how come that after the {n} the {S} follows ?
this produces (cvccvc).
the rule refers to clusters of three (cvc-cvc-cvc), or does it go like
(cvcvcvcvc..) ? so far I thought that according to this rule, right after a
consonant always a vowel follows.
qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
On 10 Dec 2016 12:16 pm, "Lieven" <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 10.12.2016 um 11:01 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
>
>> we are always saying that klingon phonology utilizes cvc. so, how do you
>> explain {'InSong} ?
>>
>
> '-I-n = C-V-C
> S-o-ng = C-V-C
>
> Why the confusion?
>
>
> --
> Lieven L. Litaer
> aka Quvar valer 'utlh
> Grammarian of the KLI
> http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
> http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Phonology
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
--001a1140fd5871964105434b52f4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">lieven:<br>
> '-I-n =3D C-V-C<br>
> S-o-ng =3D C-V-C<br>
> Why the confusion?</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">according to the rule of cvc, how come that after the {n} th=
e {S} follows ? this produces (cvccvc).</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">the rule refers to clusters of three (cvc-cvc-cvc), or does =
it go like (cvcvcvcvc..) ? so far I thought that according to this rule, ri=
ght after a consonant always a vowel follows.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 10 Dec 2016 12=
:16 pm, "Lieven" <<a href=3D"mailto:levinius@gmx.de">levinius@=
gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex=
">Am 10.12.2016 um 11:01 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
we are always saying that klingon phonology utilizes cvc. so, how do you<br=
>
explain {'InSong} ?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
'-I-n =3D C-V-C<br>
S-o-ng =3D C-V-C<br>
<br>
Why the confusion?<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Lieven L. Litaer<br>
aka Quvar valer 'utlh<br>
Grammarian of the KLI<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher" rel=3D"noreferrer" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://www.facebook.com/Klingo<wbr>nteacher</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Phonology" rel=3D"noreferrer" targ=
et=3D"_blank">http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/<wbr>Phonology</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" target=3D"_blank">tlhIngan-Ho=
l@lists.kli.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
--001a1140fd5871964105434b52f4--
--===============4771301955031631056==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============4771301955031631056==--
