[102626] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Objects, direct and indirect
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI')
Fri Nov 27 00:55:26 2015
From: ghunchu'wI' <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
In-Reply-To: <DM3PR16MB070039A9EFBAB83C83D1C500A4030@DM3PR16MB0700.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:55:06 -0500
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On Nov 27, 2015, at 12:17 AM, David Holt <kenjutsuka@live.com> wrote:
> My own personal opinion (however good or bad it may be) is that the subject of the root sentence must always be represented somewhere in the {-moH} sentence.
1) I believe {SeymoH QeH} is a counterexample.
2) You state your opinion as if composing a {-moH} sentence is a process that goes through a non-moH phase along the way. I don't agree with that view.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
