[102262] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] KGT grammar
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qunnoQ HoD)
Thu Nov 12 13:58:56 2015
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmPCUZEytJ+ZbX3axyKn3V_8T=crj8yhU3EOYsn0uGqkPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:58:40 +0200
From: qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============7832722411099456777==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3db70013b8d05245c882e
--001a11c3db70013b8d05245c882e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
ok,thanks. I will make sure to go through TKD several times before moving
on to KGT,and finally to the grammarian's desk.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:47 PM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
> qunnoQ HoD:
> > ..being on the subject though,I would like to ask where does "the
> > grammarian's desk" stand in comparison to all this. what is its level of
> > complexity ? when should someone study it ? after the KGT or before it ?
>
> The Grammarian's Desk is not by Okrand, but rather by Captain Krankor.
> It contains speculation about aspects of grammar which were unclear at
> the time the HolQeD articles were published which were eventually
> gathered into the book. Okrand has subsequently clarified some of
> these points.
>
> For a beginner, I would recommend not reading The Grammarian's Desk
> until one has a very solid grasp of basic grammar. Otherwise, one
> might get confused by what is good Klingon grammar, and what is
> Krankor's opinion only which is possibly later contradicted by Okrand.
>
> --
> De'vID
>
--001a11c3db70013b8d05245c882e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">ok,thanks. I will make sure to go through TKD several time=
s before moving on to KGT,and finally to the grammarian's desk.<br></di=
v><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 12,=
2015 at 8:47 PM, De'vID <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:de.vid=
.jonpin@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>></span>=
wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor=
der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">qunnoQ HoD:<br>
<span class=3D"">> ..being on the subject though,I would like to ask whe=
re does "the<br>
> grammarian's desk" stand in comparison to all this. what is i=
ts level of<br>
> complexity ? when should someone study it ? after the KGT or before it=
?<br>
<br>
</span>The Grammarian's Desk is not by Okrand, but rather by Captain Kr=
ankor.<br>
It contains speculation about aspects of grammar which were unclear at<br>
the time the HolQeD articles were published which were eventually<br>
gathered into the book. Okrand has subsequently clarified some of<br>
these points.<br>
<br>
For a beginner, I would recommend not reading The Grammarian's Desk<br>
until one has a very solid grasp of basic grammar. Otherwise, one<br>
might get confused by what is good Klingon grammar, and what is<br>
Krankor's opinion only which is possibly later contradicted by Okrand.<=
br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
De'vID<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c3db70013b8d05245c882e--
--===============7832722411099456777==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============7832722411099456777==--
