[102243] in tlhIngan-Hol
[Tlhingan-hol] KGT grammar
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qunnoQ HoD)
Thu Nov 12 10:25:46 2015
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:25:30 +0200
From: qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============9014227358350638912==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed678a45b050524598d45
--001a113ed678a45b050524598d45
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Suppose there is someone,who wishes to go through the ENTIRE canon klingon
grammar once,and then proceed by reviewing it again and again,in order to
learn it.
This someone has gone through TKD once. Can he start reviewing it again,or
should he proceed by studying the KGT and *then* start his review ?
Does TKD contain the 100% of klingon grammar,or is there any NEW grammar
(even a 5%) in KGT ?
cpt qunnoQ
--001a113ed678a45b050524598d45
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>Suppose there is someone,who wishes to go t=
hrough the ENTIRE canon klingon grammar once,and then proceed by reviewing =
it again and again,in order to learn it.<br><br></div>This someone has gone=
through TKD once. Can he start reviewing it again,or should he proceed by =
studying the KGT and *then* start his review ?<br><br></div>Does TKD contai=
n the 100% of klingon grammar,or is there any NEW grammar (even a 5%) in KG=
T ?<br><br></div>cpt qunnoQ<br></div>
--001a113ed678a45b050524598d45--
--===============9014227358350638912==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============9014227358350638912==--
