[102131] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qa'vam?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick)
Tue Nov 10 00:02:53 2015

From: Rohan Fenwick <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:02:25 +1000
In-Reply-To: <CAMZYS2UfhiUwX_r4ZMOQmZ2XxmyvN9r-5OJAKOFfqndS7C6nag@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org

--===============6569626806522531538==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_2ac670d0-3fae-4330-8306-ebf00b199c85_"

--_2ac670d0-3fae-4330-8306-ebf00b199c85_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ghItlhpu' naHQun=2C jatlh:
> How would y'all use {qa'vam}?> Can I use it as a time stamp?

Ooo. That's a fascinating question. My first instinct says no=2C but then i=
t makes me think of those times where I've seen {bI'reS} used as a time sta=
mp roughly equivalent to "at first"=2C and though we have no canon for it=
=2C I do like that usage. Similarly=2C if {qa'vam} appears in the right pla=
ce syntactically=2C I guess there's no reason it couldn't be interpreted as=
 "in the beginning" (in the biblical sense) or "at the birth of the univers=
e". I don't know how many contexts you could use it in - it's a pretty narr=
ow meaning - but by the same token=2C {qaStaHvIS qa'vam} doesn't sound quit=
e right to me either.

I suppose it depends how long you want to draw your bow. It's questionable =
but interesting.

QeS 'utlh
 		 	   		  =

--_2ac670d0-3fae-4330-8306-ebf00b199c85_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>ghItlhpu' naHQun=2C jatlh:<br>&g=
t=3B How would y'all use {qa'vam}?<div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>&gt=3B Can I u=
se it as a time stamp?<br><br>Ooo. That's a fascinating question. My first =
instinct says no=2C but then it makes me think of those times where I've se=
en {bI'reS} used as a time stamp roughly equivalent to "at first"=2C and th=
ough we have no canon for it=2C I do like that usage. Similarly=2C if {qa'v=
am} appears in the right place syntactically=2C I guess there's no reason i=
t couldn't be interpreted as "in the beginning" (in the biblical sense) or =
"at the birth of the universe". I don't know how many contexts you could us=
e it in - it's a pretty narrow meaning - but by the same token=2C {qaStaHvI=
S qa'vam} doesn't sound quite right to me either.<br><br>I suppose it depen=
ds how long you want to draw your bow. It's questionable but interesting.<b=
r><br>QeS 'utlh<br></div></div></div> 		 	   		  </div></body>
</html>=

--_2ac670d0-3fae-4330-8306-ebf00b199c85_--


--===============6569626806522531538==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============6569626806522531538==--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post