[101855] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Significance of constructed languages

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Tue Nov 3 08:52:36 2015

In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cKMiS6ot009qKg47=CGRgb7vOv8bZQSW2ooLGxpx=A7Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:51:51 +0100
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>,
 qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org

On 3 November 2015 at 14:25, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Get away from the noun centric English, and think in Klingon, using
>> "action".
>
> you mean that there is a suffix/prefix indicating <<to act>> ?

He means that, instead of "the Council handed Worf a discommendation
[noun]", rephrase the idea as "the Council discommended [verb] Worf".

-- 
De'vID

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post