[101810] in tlhIngan-Hol
[Tlhingan-hol] HolQeD grammar
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qunnoQ HoD)
Mon Nov 2 10:53:13 2015
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:52:57 +0200
From: qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============4481237154637393414==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a97ba5f62ef052390c581
--047d7b3a97ba5f62ef052390c581
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
there is something I would like to ask..
someone studies the grammar of TKD & KGT. but he cannot find any of the
HolQeD issues. So his grammar comes exclusively from these 2 books...
should he worry,that without HolQeD he will be missing anything on Klingon
grammar ? or -to ask what worries me- can I sleep peacefully at
night,knowing that I may never find HolQeD,but since I have TKD and KGT I
will be ok ?
qunnoQ HoD
--047d7b3a97ba5f62ef052390c581
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>there is something I would like to ask..<br=
><br></div>someone studies the grammar of TKD & KGT. but he cannot find=
any of the HolQeD issues. So his grammar comes exclusively from these 2 bo=
oks...<br><br></div>should he worry,that without HolQeD he will be missing =
anything on Klingon grammar ? or -to ask what worries me- can I sleep peace=
fully at night,knowing that I may never find HolQeD,but since I have TKD an=
d KGT I will be ok ?<br><br></div>qunnoQ HoD<br></div>
--047d7b3a97ba5f62ef052390c581--
--===============4481237154637393414==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============4481237154637393414==--
