[101476] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: wovmoHwI'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Roney, Jr.)
Fri Oct 23 10:27:46 2015
In-Reply-To: <CALPi+eRhqJr=mggYnGVrweaZvmNj1v7Ws1DxPL2D2beTup=m-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:27:31 -0400
From: "Michael Roney, Jr." <nahqun@gmail.com>
To: qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net>
Cc: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============4420229570179370516==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142d8d477274f0522c669b8
--001a1142d8d477274f0522c669b8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:12 AM, qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net> wrote:
> The canon is the same for everyone, although everyone's interpretations
of them might not be identical.
>
I think there's a divide on whether or not the paq'batlh is canon. Perhaps
even Talk Now.
Besides those, I think we're all on the same page.
>There's also the possibility of errors or omissions in dictionaries people
compile themselves due to simple human error or oversight. I know my
dictionary has some errors in it >that I might never find, such is the
downside of compiling it oneself without having others check it.
>
That's the upside to using your dictionary for the WOTD, you get to slowly
share it with the masses and if there's an error or omission, they'll be
quick to point it out.
WRT {wovmoHwI'} I think De'vID 's notation of "device" works a bit better
than "lamp" simply because "device" sounds more informative and "lamp"
seems too restrictive.
~naHQun
--
~Michael Roney, Jr.
Freelance Translator
--001a1142d8d477274f0522c669b8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:12 AM, qurgh lungqIj <<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:qurgh@wizage.net">qurgh@wizage.net</a>> wrote:<br><br>> T=
he canon is the same for everyone, although everyone's interpretations =
of them might not be identical.=C2=A0<br>><br><br>I think there's a =
divide on whether or not the paq'batlh is canon. Perhaps even Talk Now.=
<div>Besides those, I think we're all on the same page.</div><div><br><=
/div><div>>There's also the possibility of errors or omissions in di=
ctionaries people compile themselves due to simple human error or oversight=
. I know my dictionary has some errors in it >that I might never find, s=
uch is the downside of compiling it oneself without having others check it.=
=C2=A0</div><div>></div><div><br></div><div>That's the upside to usi=
ng your dictionary for the WOTD, you get to slowly share it with the masses=
and if there's an error or omission, they'll be quick to point it =
out.</div><div>WRT {wovmoHwI'} I think De'vID 's notation of &q=
uot;device" works a bit better than "lamp" simply because &q=
uot;device" sounds more informative and "lamp" seems too res=
trictive.<br><br><br>~naHQun</div><div><br></div><div><br>--<br>~Michael Ro=
ney, Jr.<br>Freelance Translator</div></div>
--001a1142d8d477274f0522c669b8--
--===============4420229570179370516==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============4420229570179370516==--
