[101463] in tlhIngan-Hol
[Tlhingan-hol] Qualification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qunnoQ HoD)
Thu Oct 22 11:08:20 2015
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:08:02 +0300
From: qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============3955188058837998667==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f6dfe88915d0522b2dc09
--001a113f6dfe88915d0522b2dc09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
in hol.kag.org,as well as in TKD,on qualification the following examples
are given :
jIyajchu' I understand clearly (yaj understand)
baHchu' he/she fired (the torpedo) perfectly (baHfire [a torpedo]
i would like to ask why in the second example the translation is given in
the past tense,while in the first example the translation is in the present
tense.
secondly,in hol.kag.org on the same subject, the following example is given
:
nepwI' Daba' he/she is obviously lying (nepwI' liar,Da act in the manner
of, behave as).
the meaning of the sentence {nepwI' Daba'} is given as <<he/she is
obviously lying>>. but as it is described,the literal meaning would be
closer to <<she is obviously behaving as liar>> wouldn't simply {nepba'} be
much closer to the <<he/she is obviously lying>> ?
qunnoQ
--001a113f6dfe88915d0522b2dc09
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">in <a href=3D"http://hol.kag.org">hol.kag.org</a>,as well =
as in TKD,on qualification the following examples are given :<br><br>
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
<div class=3D"">jIyajchu' I understand clearly (yaj understand)<br>ba=
Hchu' he/she fired (the torpedo) perfectly (baHfire [a torpedo]<br><br>=
</div><div class=3D"">i would like to ask why in the second example the tra=
nslation is given in the past tense,while in the first example the translat=
ion is in the present tense.<br><br></div><div class=3D""><br>secondly,in <=
a href=3D"http://hol.kag.org">hol.kag.org</a> on the same subject, the foll=
owing example is given :<br><br>nepwI' Daba' he/she is obviously ly=
ing (nepwI' liar,Da act in the manner of, behave as). <br><br></div><di=
v class=3D"">the meaning of the sentence {nepwI' Daba'} is given as=
<<he/she is obviously lying>>. but as it is described,the lite=
ral meaning would be closer to <<she is obviously behaving as liar>=
;> wouldn't simply {nepba'} be much closer to the <<he/she=
is obviously lying>> ?<br><br></div><div class=3D"">qunnoQ<br>
=09
</div></div>
--001a113f6dfe88915d0522b2dc09--
--===============3955188058837998667==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============3955188058837998667==--
