[100169] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] tera' Hovtay'Daq PLUTO HurDaq bIHtaH'a' latlh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Wed Jan 21 17:04:25 2015
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:50:31 -0500
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CABSTb1dFxxgtAMX4Pb2kpOYTUGwRUyhKhKwr1ffjcL+LisJNJw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On 1/21/2015 4:45 PM, Bellerophon, modeler wrote:
>
> n Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:28 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name
> <mailto:sustel@trimboli.name>> wrote:
>
> On 1/21/2015 4:24 PM, Bellerophon, modeler wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:34 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name
> <mailto:sustel@trimboli.name>
> <mailto:sustel@trimboli.name <mailto:sustel@trimboli.name>>> wrote:
>
> Perhaps this:
>
> Dochvam tIbuv: yuQ pagh yuQHom.
>
>
> Why {pagh} instead of {ghap}? Are two sentences implied?
>
>
> DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'!
>
>
> chaq pab lughbe' lo'lu' 'e' Qob neH vItu'.
mu'tlheghvam vIyajbe'.
> pab vIqel. vaj jIghel. bIQIjlaH'a'?
pab vIQIjnISbogh yIngu'; qayajbe'.
The correct sentence above should be:
Dochvam tIbuv: yuQ yuQHom ghap.
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol