[98940] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 5.2 upgrade & /etc/fstab

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Raymond Popowich)
Wed Nov 11 09:18:29 1998

Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:17:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Raymond Popowich <popowich@acsu.buffalo.edu>
To: Patrick Bauer <bauerp@niagara.com>
cc: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9811110414000.3552-100000@peachy.fruit>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com


I had the same problem when I upgraded to 5.2 yesterday.  You have to
move all lines that have the word 'ignore' to the end of the list.  I
just put everything else in order.  I think I saw something about it
before on this list, maybe not.


/dev/hda2  /blah
/dev/hdc5  /more_blah  (just examples)   
/dev/hdd1  / 
/dev/cdrom
/dev/fd0
none       /proc
automount  /misc

/dev/hda1  none       ignore 0 0 0
/dev/hda4  none       ignore 0 0 0
/dev/hdc1  none       ignore 0 0 0
/dev/hdd4  none       ignore 0 0 0

It's just a formatted example that works for me...


On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Patrick Bauer wrote:

>> What i did... was to re-build /etc/fstab... using vi... i re-typed all the
>> entries manually..
>> 
>> Pat.
>> 
>> On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Jan Carlson wrote:
>> 
>> > Afanassy Thompson wrote:
>> > 
>> > > I've upgraded from 5.1 to 5.2. The most pressing problem is that only
>> > > some of /etc/fstab is read.
>> > > /proc is reported as not being found as are 2 partitions. The entries
>> > > are there.
>> > 
>> > 5.2 seems picky about spacing.  These lines will work, if they are the first
>> > non-comments in your file.   Spacing counts.  I think it's a bug in the
>> > parsing.
>> > 
>> > /dev/sda6               /                       ext2    defaults        1 1
>> > none                    /proc                   proc    defaults        0 0
>> > 
>> > 
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Does anyone have a fix. The only error messages are that they're not
>> > > found in /etc/mtab or /etc/fstab. I know one other person had this
>> > > same problem with an upgrade. Some of it is read just fine.
>> > >
>> > > Clean install is not a good option- this is on a server.
>> > > Afanassy
>> > > --
>> > > Jay M. Thompson    Systems Administrator:  GeckoNet.net
>> > > Email: afanassy@geckonet.net       http://www.geckonet.net
>> > > =============================================================================
>> > > PGP Public Key at http://www.geckonet.net
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >   PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>> > >                http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
>> > >          To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
>> > >                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>> > 
>> > --
>> > 
>> > Jan Carlson
>> > janc@iname.com   Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
>> > Mailed with Netscape 4.5 on Red Hat Linux 5.2
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> >   PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>> > 		http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
>> >          To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with 
>> >                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>> > 
>> 

-----
Raymond Popowich
popowich@acsu.buffalo.edu



-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
		http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
         To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post