[97317] in RedHat Linux List
Re: Why upgrade to 5.2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Wood)
Mon Nov 2 15:28:30 1998
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 15:22:30 -0500
From: Eric Wood <eric@interplas.com>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
I have a RH 5.0 box that I've been updating with (some) 5.1 errata rpms
and now 5.2 rpms. For example, I just installed samba-1.9.18p10 that
comes with 5.2 onto my 5.0 box. But that's just one package out of
many... but no, I don't think you're missing anything.
I think the 2.2 kernel will be a major reason to upgrade (after it has
been out a few months.)
-Eric Wood
Jason Gibson wrote:
>
> I am running 5.1 with a 2.0.36 kernel. I see absolutely no reason to
> upgrade before kernel 2.2.0 (possibly not then either, just upgrade kernel).
> Am I missing something?
>
> -----------------------
> Jason Gibson
> RF-Engineer
> jasongi*NoSp@m*nt.com (remove the *NoSp m* to email)
>
> > Windows 98: n.
> > minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a
> > 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit
> > microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of
> > competition.
> >
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
-Eric Wood
MIS Director
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
