[3923] in RedHat Linux List
Re: Fortran 77 and 90
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hal L. DeVore Jr.)
Mon Nov 11 16:53:03 1996
To: RHS Linux User <pancho@galaxy.ce.uevora.pt>
Cc: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Nov 1996 19:05:01 GMT."
<Pine.LNX.3.95.961111190339.6364C-100000@galaxy.ce.uevora.pt>
Reply-To: hdevore@crow.bmc.com
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:45:20 -0600
From: "Hal L. DeVore Jr." <hdevore@crow.bmc.com>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
pancho@galaxy.ce.uevora.pt said:
> Is that feasible? I mean does it converse all the fortran commands
> into c? does it make a one to one conversion? For what I know it
> doesn't... but well I dont know much about it anyway...
I have always assumed that was why f2c existed (and p2c for that matter) but
I haven't written any Fortran since the late 1970s or Pascal since the mid
1980s so I can't speak from experience for either one.
In the spirit of Linux why don't you give it a try. Learn by doing.
Hal DeVore (hdevore@bmc.com)
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
