[3540] in RedHat Linux List
Re: modules: which rpm?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Borg)
Sat Nov 9 01:23:11 1996
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 1996 22:13:57 -0800
From: Borg <{vladimip@iceonline.com}>
To: Red Hat Mailing List <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Ray Curtis wrote:
........
>
> I have question here, maybe its a misunderstanding about what
> you did. But it seems to me if you just built a new kernel
> with all these things as modules, why did you put the alias
> entries in /etc/conf.modules ? Kerneld should have loaded
> and unloaded them automatically for you and these entries
> below where unnecessary, that is assumming you built the
> kernel to use kerneld. Anyone ?
yes, I did build everything I could as a module,
also included kerneld support. Judging by your answer,
I don't need /etc/conf.modules at all, as I understand.
I was simply confused by that tool in control panel,
which, it seems to me now, I don't need to use either.
Why does it exist then? RedHat 4.0 manual says that's
what you use for kerneld interface...
--
*** #include <disclaimer.h> ***** Good pings come in small packets
******** Vlad Petersen ********** ********************************
*** <vladimip@iceonline.com> **** **** Linux: OS I can trust *****
******** Vancouver, B.C. ******** ********************************
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
