[2611] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 4.0 & MetroX on new (re)install

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pom)
Mon Nov 4 14:43:58 1996

Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Pom <pom@spiritone.com>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <9611041919.AA23359@glacier>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com

Hey hey...

Well I have a 4meg Matrox MGA Mill card as well and for some
reason the only screen option I can use is the 800x600, if
I go higher than that I get what looks like water running 
down my screen. I am using a Vivitron 17" (1776) monitor as
well. In Win95 I can go up to 1280x1024 in 16bit color just
fine. MetroX I dont think is all that good, a substandered
product. Soon as Mr. Clause comes a calling I will make sure
he leaves the newest ver of Accel. X under my tree.

Dave

On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Rick Forrester wrote:

> 
> Shifting partitions around this weekend, decided to reinstall Red Hat 
> 4.0.  One of the reasons for shifting around was purchase of new MGA 
> Matrox Millenium 4Mb video card.
> 
> On my previous install I had problems with MetroX; I finally gave up & 
> just loaded XFree86 v3.1.2G, which suited my ATI Graphics Xpression 
> CT264 card just fine.  With the Matrox card I don't have that option.  
> Two points came up right away:
> 
> 1.  Can someone point me to where the documentation on what driver the 
> X link is supposed to point to?  As it was installed (twice), it seems 
> to point to never-never land, and I don't seem to have much luck 
> locating documentation.  And, yes, I have the official version, with 
> manual.
> 
> 2.  When trying to configure the card in the first place, the best 
> options MetroX seems to give is for 1024X768 resolution @ 70Hz.  Did I 
> miss something?  My other installation, with AcceleratedX installed, 
> supports up to 1600x1200 at a faster refresh rate.  Should be able to 
> do better than 1024X768 with a 4Mb Matrox Millenium card and a 
> Viewsonic PT770 17" monitor.
> 
> 3.  No, I'd prefer not, for now, to install AcceleratedX with RH 4.0.  
> I'm stubborn, I'd like to get what I paid for working as well as 
> possible. 8^)
> 
> TIA
> 
> Rick F.
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Rick Forrister               | <rickf@glacier.jpl.nasa.gov      |
> | Win 95: Where do you want to go today?                          |
> | Linux:  What do you want tomorrow?                              |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> --
>   PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>   ________________________________________________________________________
>   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
>   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips  http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
> 
> 


--
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
  ________________________________________________________________________
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips  http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post