[101861] in RedHat Linux List
Re: RH 5.2 - 2.0.36-0.7 vs: 2.0.36
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jan Carlson)
Mon Nov 30 01:52:57 1998
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 01:52:10 -0500
From: Jan Carlson <janc@iname.com>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
"J.D." wrote:
> Quoting Michael (michael@area54.net):
> > On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Brett Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Your kidding! I just looked before I sent that reply out. Wow things
> > > move fast.
> >
> > kernel-2.0.36-1.i386.rpm & friends are on updates.redhat.com but not
> > listed in the errata..
> > ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/i386/
>
> Could these .rpm's be safely applied to a 5.1 system, just for the sake of
> the newer kernel??
It seems to be a little faster...
>
>
> Thanks,
> jdk
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
Jan Carlson
janc@iname.com Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
Mailed with Netscape 4.5 on Red Hat Linux 5.2
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
