|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Lokh <Patrice.Fortier@aquarel.fr> To: gtk-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 22:08:23 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.981013125846.22495E-100000@harper.uchicago.edu> from "Havoc Pennington" at Oct 13, 98 01:01:31 pm Resent-From: gtk-list@redhat.com Reply-To: gtk-list@redhat.com Just to add my $0.02 on this list: > - portability ... of correct C++ compilers. When S&P started gtk there was no good portable C++ compiler. The only non-proprietary (and so, portable) one was g++ 2.7, which is just crap. Things have changed with egcs, but this is not the point. > - author preference > - customizable object system which allows bindings to other languages, > including C++ (Gtk--) I don't this was a strong argument at that time (although it is currently a strong one). > - Unix default language And in particular, Gimp default language. Gtk isn't called Gimp ToolKit for nothing (it was call Gimp T.K., then GNU T.K, then Gimp T.K again AFAIK) Lokh. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |