[9465] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Pirate Utopia," FEED, February 20, 2001

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Dillinger)
Mon Sep 24 15:28:50 2001

Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
To: Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
Cc: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
In-Reply-To: <98ba5a909156be25b0ffc9bacbed7e44@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0109241138120.6890-100000@bolt.sonic.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Nomen Nescio wrote:

>The Stegdetect paper proceeded to further analyze the 20000+ images by
>looking for passwords that would produce meaningful messages from the
>hypothesized hidden content, via dictionary attack.  No valid passwords
>were found, and the authors concluded therefore that these were all
>false positives.  This does not seem to be a fully supported conclusion.

Actually, dictionary attacks reveal about sixty percent of passwords, 
so for every six passwords you find on a dictionary attack, you can 
infer ten actual stegotexts times the ratio between your analyzed and 
discovered (possibly-false) positives.  

While he has analyzed only two percent of his sample, that's a sufficient 
number that if even even a tenth of one percent of his positives were 
real he'd have discovered at least a few passwords. 

The paper is solid statistical methods; lack of any dictionary-yeilding 
passwords in that big a sample is very strong evidence that the sample 
is overwhelmingly made up of false positives.

				Bear




---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post