[9295] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Congress mulls crypto restrictions in response to attacks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim McCoy)
Sat Sep 15 13:00:51 2001
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 20:43:56 -0700
From: Jim McCoy <mccoy@io.com>
To: Bram Cohen <bram@gawth.com>, Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
Cc: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>,
<cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Message-ID: <B7C81C8C.AAD5%mccoy@io.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0109132330470.9897-100000@ultra.gawth.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Bram Cohen at bram@gawth.com wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Bill Frantz wrote:
>
>> So the honorable gentlemen are proposing unilateral crypto disarmament? Or
>> perhaps a world where many governments can read the business plans and
>> strategies of US companies? Or perhaps a world where the terrorists
>> themselves can read the travel plans of their targets?
>
> Preliminary indications are that the terrorists communicated on perfectly
> ordinary cell phones - it's dubious that they used any crypto at all.
It is well known and documented that these cells use PGP and stego tools
when necessary, probably because they are relatively easy and available.
While the information needed to build such tools can be found on the web, Al
Qaeda does not need to because people like us have already made them widely
available. Sad, but true.
jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
