[7826] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Trei, Peter)
Fri Sep 15 19:42:30 2000
Message-ID: <F504A8CEE925D411AF4A00508B8BE90A039344@exna07.securitydynamics.com>
From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com>
To: Bram Cohen <bram@gawth.com>, "'Greg Rose'" <ggr@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo.michelangeli@firstecom.com>, cryptography@c2.net
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:02:58 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Well, that IS interesting. I note that there is both a government and
a civilian version, but I can't tell if they use different crypto. Of
course,
it's probably impossible to obtain an independent verification of the
security.
Peter
> ----------
> From: Greg Rose[SMTP:ggr@qualcomm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 9:59 PM
> To: Bram Cohen
> Cc: Enzo Michelangeli; cryptography@c2.net
> Subject: Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone...
>
> At 22:08 00/09/13 -0700, Bram Cohen wrote:
> >Wouldn't it be ironic if they resort to buying a bunch of stariums ...
> >-Bram Cohen
> >
> >[That would require that Stariums actually appear on the market at
> >some point. --Perry]
>
> Stariums (a) should appear RSN (I have one) but (b) are not mobile.
>
> There's the Qsec-800 CDMA mobile from Qualcomm, but that won't work in
> England I don't think. See http://www.qualcomm.com/govsys/qsec.html .
>
> Disclaimer: I work for one and invest in both, so I'm biased.
> Greg.
>
> Greg Rose INTERNET: ggr@Qualcomm.com
> Qualcomm Australia VOICE: +61-2-9181-4851 FAX: +61-2-9181-5470
> Suite 410, Birkenhead Point, http://people.qualcomm.com/ggr/
> Drummoyne NSW 2047 232B EC8F 44C6 C853 D68F E107 E6BF CD2F 1081 A37C
>
>
