[7816] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[Fwd: [Freesw] [Fwd: software patents in Europe]]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Laurie)
Thu Sep 14 11:05:15 2000

Message-ID: <39C080C9.4863BAA7@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:39:53 +0100
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cryptography <cryptography@c2.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------C93D78A7DF883F7C7A84DE4A"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------C93D78A7DF883F7C7A84DE4A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry about the mess of cross-forwarding!

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

Coming to ApacheCon Europe 2000? http://apachecon.com/
--------------C93D78A7DF883F7C7A84DE4A
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <freesw-admin@conecta.it>
Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6])
	by scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 328A511701
	for <ben@scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk>; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:37:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailgate.algroup.co.uk (mailgate.algroup.co.uk [194.128.162.5]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA20452 for <ben@freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk>; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:43:13 +0100
Received: (qmail 25766 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Sep 2000 07:37:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 7636 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2000 07:37:17 -0000
Received: from mail.conecta.it (root@213.185.5.2)
  by mailgate.algroup.co.uk with SMTP; 14 Sep 2000 07:37:17 -0000
Received: from mail.conecta.it (bin@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.conecta.it (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03716;
	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:56:02 +0200
Received: from tcbru42.cec.be (tcbru42.cec.be [158.169.131.23])
	by mail.conecta.it (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03683
	for <freesw@conecta.it>; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:55:52 +0200
From: Philippe.AIGRAIN@cec.eu.int
Received: from tcbru42.cec.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tcbru42.cec.be (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13293
	for <freesw@conecta.it>; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:36:33 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from MX6.CEC.BE (mx6.cec.be [158.169.131.17])
	by tcbru42.cec.be (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA13279
	for <freesw@conecta.it>; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:36:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by MX6.CEC.BE (Soft-Switch LMS 3.2) with x400 via DCNBRU1
          id 0057330026374162; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:27:53 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=CEC/ADMD=RTT/C=BE/; Relayed;
               Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:36:17 +0200
X400-Originator: Philippe.AIGRAIN@cec.eu.int
X400-Recipients: freesw@conecta.it
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=CEC/ADMD=RTT/C=BE/;0057330026374162000002L322]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
Content-Identifier: Re: Freesw Fwd: 
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:36:17 +0200
To: <freesw@conecta.it>
Subject: Re: [Freesw] [Fwd: software patents in Europe]
Message-ID: <WIN1879-000914073449-2992*/G=Philippe/S=AIGRAIN/OU=ESPRIT/O=DG13/PRMD=CEC/ADMD=RTT/C=BE/@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <39BFA191.4F7124F6@algroup.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Reply-To: freesw@conecta.it
Sender: freesw-admin@conecta.it
Errors-To: freesw-admin@conecta.it
X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: mailing list dedicated to free software/libre software discussion <freesw.conecta.it>
X-BeenThere: freesw@conecta.it

If the information is correct (which I am not in a position
to confirm), you should say YEP and not GAK. It seems
unlikely that the EPO can obtain agreement in the coming
diplomatic conference on a text that would be opposed by
Germany, the UK and France.

Additional precision: from what I understand, this would have
been a vote in the board of EPO, on which text would be
proposed for revision of the European Patent Convention
at the Conference.
The original proposal of the Director of EPO was for straight
removal of art. 52 paragraphs (2)to(4), that is exclusions
to patentability, based on argumentation that the requirements
of inventive step, industrial applications, etc, were
sufficient. I do not know if this is the proposal that was
discussed in the board.

Philippe

> Gak!!!
> 
> --
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
> 
> Coming to ApacheCon Europe 2000? http://apachecon.com/
> 
>                 - - - Forwarded Message - - -
> 
>                                           Internet: owner-cryptography@c2.net
> 
>                                                               Authorised by: 
> 
>                                                Internet: smb@research.att.com
>                                                 Freeform name: Steve Bellovin
> 
> Message ID:    20000913125531.E57D435DC2(a)smb.research.att.com
> 
> To:            Internet: cryptography@c2.net
> 
> Subject:       software patents in Europe
> 
> (Not strictly on-topic, but nevertheless of likely interest to many 
> readers of this list.)
> 
> According to the (online) Wall Street Journal, the board of 
> administration of the European Patents Office has voted to permit 
> software patents, by a 10-9 vote.  Opposition to the change came from 
> the Germans, the French, and the British; smaller countries, such as 
> Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Cyprus, supported it.  A German 
> official is quoted as saying "We would have problems with the U.S.
> tendency to patent everything that can be patented. That would stifle
> innovation and cause a glut of litigation."
> 
> A final decision will be made in November.
> 
> 
>                 --Steve Bellovin
> 
> 
> 
> 
>              - - - End of Forwarded Message - - -

_______________________________________________
Freesw mailing list
Freesw@conecta.it
http://mail.conecta.it/mailman/listinfo/freesw

--------------C93D78A7DF883F7C7A84DE4A--



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post