[12899] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Run a remailer, go to jail?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Owen)
Fri Mar 28 17:19:05 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
From: Michael Owen <mowen@costco.com>
To: "'cryptography@wasabisystems.com'" <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:52:27 -0800

While taking a look at the proposed Texas law, it appears that it
only applies if you are trying to actually cause harm:

QUOTE: 
SECTION 2.  Sections 31.12(a), (b), and (e), Penal Code, are 
amended to read as follows:
	(a)  A person commits an offense if, with the intent to harm 
or defraud a communication service

It doesn't look as bad as it was made out to be, but it all
depends on how they determine "intent".

[Moderator's note: is using a NAT box "intent to defraud" a cable
modem provider? --Perry]

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post