[128] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: PCS Encryption?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Shostack)
Mon Feb 3 09:56:47 1997
From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19970202034136.0071981c@pop.pipeline.com> from John Young at "Feb 1, 97 10:41:36 pm"
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:18:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Doug_Merrill@rand.org, cryptography@c2.net
John Young wrote:
| http://www.nsa.gov:8080/programs/missi/condor.html
# How secure is CONDOR?
#
# Current proof-of-concept hardware is FORTEZZA(TM) based
# (sensitive but unclassified) Product versions will use STU
# for cellular voice and FORTEZZA(TM) Plus for net broadcast
# mode and data
I was under the impression that Fortezza was ok for classified
traffic. Did I miss the changeover, was it unannounced, or was I
simply misremembering?
Adam
--
Pet peeve of the day: Security companies whose protocols dare not
speak their name, because they don't have one. Guilty company of the
day is now V-One.
