[12632] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Will Rodger)
Thu Mar 6 09:58:10 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 22:16:51 -0500
From: Will Rodger <wrodger@pobox.com>
In-reply-to: <3E669E6C.3080603@monmouth.com>
To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com

John says:

>Wireless is a horse of a different color.  IANAL but
>the last time I looked, there was no federal law
>against intercepting most wireless signals, but you
>were (generally) not allowed to disclose the contents
>to anyone else.

No longer, if it ever was. It's a crime, as evidenced by the wireless 
scandal a few years back when some Democrat partisan intercepted 
communications of Republican leadership in Florida, then talked. The simple 
act of interception was illegal.

Will Rodger



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post