[89] in The Cryptographic File System users list
Re: esm vs ssh, was Re: Annoying CFS bug fixed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael H. Warfield)
Mon Jul 13 14:09:05 1998
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Mon Jul 13 18:09:04 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@research.att.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 24482 invoked from network); 13 Jul 1998 18:09:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rumor.research.att.com) (192.20.225.9)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 13 Jul 1998 18:09:04 -0000
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Mon Jul 13 14:02:47 EDT 1998
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research; Mon Jul 13 14:05:27 EDT 1998
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA10770;
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA09024 for cfs-users-list; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:00:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from research.att.com (research.research.att.com [135.207.30.100]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA09020 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from alcove.wittsend.com ([130.205.0.20]) by research; Mon Jul 13 14:04:37 EDT 1998
Received: (from mhw@localhost)
by alcove.wittsend.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA03635;
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:04:23 -0400
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@alcove.wittsend.com>
Message-Id: <199807131804.OAA03635@alcove.wittsend.com>
Subject: Re: esm vs ssh, was Re: Annoying CFS bug fixed
In-Reply-To: <199807131750.MAA31917@byers.dejanews.com> from Travis Hassloch at "Jul 13, 1998 12:50:53 pm"
To: travish@dejanews.com (Travis Hassloch)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:04:23 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: travish@dejanews.com, cfs-users@research.att.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
Travis Hassloch enscribed thusly:
> Actually I just heard rumors that ssh 2.0 will be commercial only
> and somewhat incompatible.
> I've also heard that a free ssh 2.0 implementation will be
> available; after all, there have to be two reference
> implementations of IETF standards.
Messages on the ssh mailing list have indicated that at least two
versions of the 2.0 version of ssh will be available. It has also been
stated that a freeware reference implimentation will be available.
> The secsh drafts have allegedly been removed from the IETF
> drafts directory.
The drafts have been removed from the IETF drafts directory because
there have been no change to them during the nominal draft expiry. The
proposal is still on track.
> It's really unclear what the future of ssh is.
Same as it ever was... Onward and upward...
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com
(The Mad Wizard) | (770) 925-8248 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
