[88] in The Cryptographic File System users list
esm vs ssh, was Re: Annoying CFS bug fixed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Travis Hassloch)
Mon Jul 13 13:54:49 1998
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Mon Jul 13 17:54:49 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@research.att.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 24247 invoked from network); 13 Jul 1998 17:54:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rumor.research.att.com) (192.20.225.9)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 13 Jul 1998 17:54:48 -0000
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Mon Jul 13 13:48:56 EDT 1998
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research; Mon Jul 13 13:52:51 EDT 1998
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA10311;
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 13:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA08911 for cfs-users-list; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 13:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from research.att.com (research.research.att.com [135.207.30.100]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA08907 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 13:46:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from homer.dejanews.com ([205.238.143.161]) by research; Mon Jul 13 13:50:55 EDT 1998
Received: from byers.dejanews.com (byers.dejanews.com [205.238.143.212])
by homer.dejanews.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA21472;
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:50:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from byers.dejanews.com (localhost.dejanews.com [127.0.0.1]) by byers.dejanews.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA31917; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:50:53 -0500
Message-Id: <199807131750.MAA31917@byers.dejanews.com>
To: Travis Hassloch <travish@dejanews.com>
cc: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: esm vs ssh, was Re: Annoying CFS bug fixed
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 May 1998 20:33:18 CDT."
<199805160133.UAA18310@otto.dejanews.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:50:53 -0500
From: Travis Hassloch <travish@dejanews.com>
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
Actually I just heard rumors that ssh 2.0 will be commercial only
and somewhat incompatible.
I've also heard that a free ssh 2.0 implementation will be
available; after all, there have to be two reference
implementations of IETF standards.
The secsh drafts have allegedly been removed from the IETF
drafts directory.
It's really unclear what the future of ssh is.
