[7] in The Cryptographic File System users list
Re: 1.4.0 under Linux?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Sheedy)
Tue Dec 16 13:14:25 1997
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Tue Dec 16 13:14:19 1997
Received: from rumor.research.att.com (rumor.research.att.com [192.20.225.9]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.7.6/2.3JIK) with SMTP id NAA26453 for <cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu>; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:14:16 -0500
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Tue Dec 16 13:11:29 EST 1997
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research-clone; Tue Dec 16 13:11:37 EST 1997
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA07727;
Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:11:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA25861 for cfs-users-list; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:11:36 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from research.att.com (research-clone.research.att.com [135.207.30.100]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA25825 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:11:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from firefly.rain.com ([206.103.56.181]) by research-clone; Tue Dec 16 13:11:05 EST 1997
Received: from firefly.rain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firefly.rain.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA10600; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 10:10:58 -0800
Message-ID: <3496C432.3C0FC378@firefly.rain.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 10:10:58 -0800
From: Sean Sheedy <seans@easystreet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.29 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
CC: cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com
Subject: Re: 1.4.0 under Linux?
References: <199712161711.MAA25547@nsa.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
Matt Blaze wrote:
> Is anyone using 1.4.0 under linux? Does it work for you? Were there
> errors or warnings when you made it?
I just got it running under Slackware Linux, kernel version 2.0.29, with a
cleaner set of fixes for the the newer rpcgen-from-hell. I'll send out the
changes once I have another day or two testing time.
Sean
--
Sean Sheedy seans@easystreet.com
Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.
-- H.L. Mencken
