[6] in The Cryptographic File System users list
1.4.0 under Linux?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Blaze)
Tue Dec 16 12:14:11 1997
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Tue Dec 16 12:14:10 1997
Received: from rumor.research.att.com (rumor.research.att.com [192.20.225.9]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.7.6/2.3JIK) with SMTP id MAA24839 for <cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu>; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:14:09 -0500
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Tue Dec 16 12:09:34 EST 1997
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research-clone; Tue Dec 16 12:11:04 EST 1997
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA06025;
Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:10:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA25553 for cfs-users-list; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:11:14 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (mab@localhost.research.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA25547 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:11:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199712161711.MAA25547@nsa.research.att.com>
To: cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com
Subject: 1.4.0 under Linux?
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:11:12 -0500
From: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
Is anyone using 1.4.0 under linux? Does it work for you? Were there
errors or warnings when you made it?
I don't run Linux myself, and there are so many versions out there with
slightly different environments (especially versions of rpcgen) that
it's very difficult to develop for. I'd like it to compile cleanly
out of the box, and I'd like to eliminate the awful make_with_bad_rpcgen
hack, so any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
-matt
