[23456] in APO-L

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[APO-L] Toast Song: If a male called a female a man...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Irwin Chui)
Sat Jan 18 04:05:41 2003

Date:         Sat, 18 Jan 2003 04:05:32 EST
Reply-To: Chewster97@aol.com
From: Irwin Chui <Chewster97@aol.com>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU

--part1_6d.784e1f6.2b5a72dc_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello, Everyone

I often here this during Toast Song discussions and debates. A female Brother
quotes "I am proud to be called a man." However, if a male were to label or
call a female a man, even though she may not be offended by the remark.
Wouldn't this potentially be interpreted as "Sexual Harassment?" Isn't sexual
harrassment a violation of the Fraternity's Risk Management Policy?

I can confirm that in states like California, New York, Texas, Florida, and
others that if this remark was vehemently condoned, employees in the
workplace would potentially encounter either job reprimand or termination.
The company or firm itself may encounter a potential future lawsuit regarding
sexual harassment, or at minimum an employee relations case dilemma by their
human resources department.

I wonder if any of you recall the Clarence Thomas U.S. Supreme Court
confirmation hearings with Anita Hill in 1991 or 1992?


Irwin Chui
Region X




--part1_6d.784e1f6.2b5a72dc_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Hello, Everyone
<BR>
<BR>I often here this during Toast Song discussions and debates. A female Brother quotes "I am proud to be called a man." However, if a male were to label or call a female a man, even though she may not be offended by the remark. Wouldn't this potentially be interpreted as "Sexual Harassment?" Isn't sexual harrassment a violation of the Fraternity's Risk Management Policy?
<BR>
<BR>I can confirm that in states like California, New York, Texas, Florida, and others that if this remark was vehemently condoned, employees in the workplace would potentially encounter either job reprimand or termination. The company or firm itself may encounter a potential future lawsuit regarding sexual harassment, or at minimum an employee relations case dilemma by their human resources department.
<BR>
<BR>I wonder if any of you recall the Clarence Thomas U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings with Anita Hill in 1991 or 1992?
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>Irwin Chui
<BR>Region X
<BR>
<BR>
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_6d.784e1f6.2b5a72dc_boundary--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post