[23094] in APO-L

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [APO-L] Felony

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Roberts)
Sat Nov 2 06:43:15 2002

Date:         Sat, 2 Nov 2002 06:51:59 -0500
Reply-To: Daniel Roberts <daniel_roberts@CORE.COM>
From: Daniel Roberts <daniel_roberts@CORE.COM>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <200210311325.g9VDPwOK000684@daffy.dardan.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alpha Phi Omega Discussion List
> [mailto:APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU]On Behalf Of Packy Anderson
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:26 AM
> To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
> Subject: Re: [APO-L] Felony
>
>
> Vehlow, Richard [Richard.Vehlow@OGS.STATE.NY.US] writes:
> > Upon seeing this discussion, suppose this amendment were amended to read
> > "brothers must be found guilty of a crime of public record or an
> > institutional charge, including hazing, to be eligible for suspension or
> > expulsion".
>
> This doesn't allow for brothers who have been found liable in a
> civil court
> or who have simply engaged in conduct that, while not illegal, was
> unbecoming of a brother of APO.  Once can easily imagine a case where a
> brother self-admittedly acts in a manner befitting expulsion, but the
> victims involved are unable or unwilling to press criminal or civil
> charges, but ARE willing to file a request for expulsion.

BINGO!

Dan

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post