[23067] in APO-L
[APO-L] Felony
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vehlow, Richard)
Thu Oct 31 08:10:40 2002
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:10:34 -0500
Reply-To: "Vehlow, Richard" <Richard.Vehlow@OGS.STATE.NY.US>
From: "Vehlow, Richard" <Richard.Vehlow@OGS.STATE.NY.US>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C280DE.E5DD0F00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Upon seeing this discussion, suppose this amendment were amended to read
"brothers must be found guilty of a crime of public record or an
institutional charge, including hazing, to be eligible for suspension or
expulsion".
Since it's staying at or below the level of felony, this amendment is within
the scope allowable for amendments to proposals.
Would this be more acceptable?
The argument about matters of trial taking too long to warrant this
stipulation, so as not to tie the fraternity's hands down is a bit flawed,
since it can take 2 years anyway to bring such an expulsion proposal up at
national convention.
-Rich Vehlow
------_=_NextPart_001_01C280DE.E5DD0F00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Felony</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Upon seeing this discussion, suppose this amendment =
were amended to read "brothers must be found guilty of a crime of =
public record or an institutional charge, including hazing, to be =
eligible for suspension or expulsion".</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Since it's staying at or below the level of felony, =
this amendment is within the scope allowable for amendments to =
proposals.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Would this be more acceptable?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The argument about matters of trial taking too long =
to warrant this stipulation, so as not to tie the fraternity's hands =
down is a bit flawed, since it can take 2 years anyway to bring such an =
expulsion proposal up at national convention. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-Rich Vehlow</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C280DE.E5DD0F00--
