[22541] in APO-L

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [APO-L] Hypothetical University Requirements.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Buddha Buck)
Tue Apr 23 17:45:24 2002

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Message-ID:  <5.1.0.14.0.20020423172141.0244fe80@mail.mac.com>
Date:         Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:42:12 -0400
Reply-To: Buddha Buck <bmbuck@14850.COM>
From: Buddha Buck <bmbuck@14850.COM>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <009301c1eb06$cfb60bf0$852414ac@braunconsult.com>

At 02:37 PM 04-23-2002 -0600, Paul Boal wrote:
>Then they'll have a huge lawsuit on their hands from a variety of groups
>including the ACLU, NOW, and various others that would interpret such a
>ridiculous policy as absolutely ridiculous!
>
>I'll assume that you aren't simply trolling and have thoughts about why this
>would happen that I simply haven't come up with.  So, in what instance would
>a co-ed university ever look at a service organization like APO and say
>"we'll allow you to form a chapter here, but it can only have male members?"

This was in the context of a claim made that there were "many" chapters
unable to recharter because their host institution wanted them to be
single-gender.  In order for that claim to be true, then the hypothetical
situation Randy suggested would have to be a real situation.

I am not convinced, by the way, that such a restriction would be
categorically dismissed.  The host institutions, as Randy pointed out, have
a lot of say in crafting the charter of any potential chapter.  The
Fraternity is somewhat aggressive in extension efforts, and may be very
willing to accept such a covenant if it means getting a chapter on a
campus.  Certainly single-gender chapters can be chartered at single-gender
institutions.

I think a more interesting hypothetical would be the other way around --
what if the administration of a single-gendered institution insisted that
an APO chapter be coed -- and suggested a way to make that possible,
through the involvement of people not enrolled in that institution (but
perhaps enrolled at a different institution with affiliations to the host
institution)?

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post