[20212] in APO-L
Re: Dartmouth's recent decision to require Fraternities to
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Finder)
Thu Feb 18 12:27:21 1999
"Reply-To: "
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:25:36 -0400
Reply-To: Randy Finder <naraht@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
From: Randy Finder <naraht@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <36C9A86F.154CCAEC@bbnplanet.com>
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, John Grossi wrote:
> > Alright how about this. Opinions on whether having single sex social gr=
eek
> > banned makes it easier or tougher for Alpha Phi Omega to get a chapter =
at
> > Dartmouth. I'm familiar with the situation at Georgetown where when soc=
ial
>=20
> Truthfully I can't say, since we never really got to the point where the
> student was actually looking for school approval. Possibly Vivs' has
> some
> thoughts, since he was the "sponsor". From my personal opinion as a
> "local"
> to the school, I would not forsee a problem with Alpha Phi Omega getting
> approval on that campus, the only "problem" might be that the school
> classifies us with the rest of there "Greeks" some of which are not much
> different than APO. (Dartmouth's Greeks cover a WIDE spectrum...)
The only question there is whether some of those Greeks are sufficiently
close to APO so as to make joining the Greek Council OK. ANy of them in
the spectrum not mutually exclusive?
Randy
>=20
>=20
> -John Grossi
> Section 94 Chairman - Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Qu=E9bec
>=20
> > fraternities were banned, the few professional fraternities on campus
> > helped APO form so there would be other groups somewhat similar to them=
on
> > campus.
>=20
--
Leadership, Friendship and Service - Alpha Phi Omega
