[20179] in APO-L
Re: Dartmouth's recent decision to require Fraternities to admit
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Finder)
Thu Feb 11 12:35:55 1999
"Reply-To: "
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 10:19:59 -0400
Reply-To: Randy Finder <naraht@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
From: Randy Finder <naraht@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990210223634.27055A-100000@polaris.acast.nova.edu>
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Joel Natt wrote:
> > I was browsing the AP News headlines and was wondering if anyone else
> > had seen this story?
> >
> I found it interesting that in the article it mentioned that they plan to
> indirectly force all Greek letter organizations to go co-ed. I did some
> checking and currently we do not have a active chapter there, but they
> have 3 other organizations that are co-ed and have pledge programs on the
> campus. This should be interesting.
About a year ago, when the subject of bringing APO to Harvard came up, I
posted a summary of the situation of APO at each of the Ivy League
Campuses. 3 Have churrently active chapters (Cornell,Penn & Yale), 3 have
inactive chapters (Columbia,Brown & Princeton) and 2 have never had
chapters (Harvard & Dartmouth) However while Harvard is almost certainly
not worth trying to start given byzantine school regulations, my entry for
Dartmouth went...
"Dartmouth: Never has had a chapter. School however has a healthy Social
Greek system including a mosiac of National & Local, Fraternities,
Sororities and co-ed frat/sor/societies. No reason to believe that
we couldn't come on campus, just apparently no one has done so. "
YiLFs
Randy Finder
Section 84 staff
>
> Joel E. Natt
> Alpha Delta Tau #14
> Past-President
> Life Member
>
--
Leadership, Friendship and Service - Alpha Phi Omega
