[2287] in SIPB-AFS-requests
Re: balance, afsmaint locker
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Fri Feb 2 14:39:19 1996
To: mhpower@MIT.EDU
Cc: ghudson@MIT.EDU, sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 1996 09:17:08 EST."
<199602021417.AA14705@stan.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 14:36:10 EST
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
> Over the past year or so, there've been a number of occasions where
> people have reached conclusions about certain disks being unsuitable
> for new volumes, but haven't made specific suggestions via mail
> (e.g., "avoid using ronald-ann:/vicepj unless you really know what's
> going on with these timing data / error patterns").
Could you please give a specific example? I think I've always been
clear about my plans. For instance, see [2229] regarding /vicepf and
/vicepg on ronald-ann. ([2229] only recommended not putting volumes
in /vicepg, but [2273] later voiced my intention to move the ata off
ronald-ann f and g; putting volumes on /vicepf before the time of
[2273] should have been okay.)
