[859] in linux-security and linux-alert archive
Re: [linux-security] A secure (?) nfs-server ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gerald Anderson)
Fri Jun 28 12:44:23 1996
To: Angel Rat <sandman@chiara.dei.unipd.it>
cc: linux-security@tarsier.cv.nrao.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Jun 1996 10:47:23 +0200."
<Pine.LNX.3.91.960625103723.14260B-100000@chiara.dei.unipd.it>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 20:39:00 -0500
From: Gerald Anderson <gander@defiant.vte.com>
Just to add my $0.02 in on the secure NFS thread. It is indeed an oxymoron
however, I though now might be a good time to point out the portmap 4 is out,
it's supposed to be substantially more secure than previous versions. I run
redhat and got the rpm off of sunsite.
Gerald
P.S. I disclaim that I REALLY think it's more secure. I just had to install
it as part of an upgrade and I just looked at the first few lines of the
README.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald D. Anderson
President Against stupidity the very gods
VTE Network Services themselves contend in vain.
Dallas, Texas USA --Asimov (AFAIK)
(214)241-2921
gander@vte.com I support Free Speech on the Internet.
http://www.vte.com/ http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.2
mQCNAzAVuh0AAAEEAMmAp4uvdvZqj+ceY5gHefIln08r4sbc97EXTvVN7jttbkty
jCN0z8iI0E8fjUwttT2IR19bZLbomlmrVIkqLyysdrVoOHPGzZ2IuWcIHu8oUxOL
pc0QnQstLC9b6kqieYDnK6EZr+ttProB+sqemKP3Hok5JzTC5GK136+dn5+JAAUR
tClHZXJhbGQgRC4gQW5kZXJzb24gPGdhbmRlckBjeWJlci52dGUuY29tPg==
=DkKi
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
