[8881] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Request splits
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?=)
Wed May 24 08:46:27 2000
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 14:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= <groudier@club-internet.fr>
To: Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@getafix.engr.sgi.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <200005232039.NAA79665@getafix.engr.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005241407150.469-100000@linux.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Chaitanya Tumuluri wrote:
[ ... ]
> I've seen databases typically request in the range of 4k - 16M; the 16M
> being _really_ _rare_ events. I'd be hardpressed for a typical value but
> I think allowing for upto 1M request size should be good.
Quite good for batch processing, by the way, if it is the direction we
want to go back. Note that performances would be excellent and O/Ses and
applications far simpler. ;-)
Or could it be some Concurrent Batch Processing system model that is
emerging in order to fit Database Virus expectations ? ;-)
Gérard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
