[8690] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Cox)
Fri Apr 21 08:42:04 2000
To: sara@procsys.com
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:33:55 +0100 (BST)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004211038030.2444-100000@yonder.procsys.com> from "sara@procsys.com" at Apr 21, 2000 10:50:47 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E12icdB-0000ML-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Do newer versions of kernel address sector_size > 4K issue?
> If not, will that require lot of work or localized changes?
Supporting block sizes over the page size is basically impossible without
rewriting half of Linux. We simply dont intend to bother.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
