[5324] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Dumb question: Which is "better" SCSI or IDE disks?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Sun Dec 6 18:50:59 1998
To: Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB <leonardz@rvib2.rvib.org.au>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 06 Dec 1998 20:42:25 +1000."
<Pine.SCO.3.96.981206204206.11479C-100000@rvib2.rvib.org.au>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 10:49:01 -0500
From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net>
In message <Pine.SCO.3.96.981206204206.11479C-100000@rvib2.rvib.org.au>,
Leonar
d Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB writes:
+-----
| I think currently spinning SCSI hard disks on the world, either in servers
| or workstation, either in Unix/Linux or NT, is 50-pin old guys, no DPT disk
| cache or RAID. My comparison is base on this current real world. Not on
| the most up-to-date technology.
+--->8
I have a number of Linux workstations, and my NT cohort has a number of NT
workstations, which beg to differ with you. :-)
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
Kiss my bits, Billy-boy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
