[5323] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Dumb question: Which is "better" SCSI or IDE disks?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Cox)
Sun Dec 6 18:25:55 1998
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
To: leonardz@rvib2.rvib.org.au (Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB)
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 16:34:44 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, leighton@mail.imake.com,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SCO.3.96.981206204355.11479D-100000@rvib2.rvib.org.au> from "Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB" at Dec 6, 98 08:44:13 pm
> I think currently spinning SCSI hard disks on the world, either in servers
> or workstation, either in Unix/Linux or NT, is 50-pin old guys, no DPT disk
And as my stats showed for real work even old 5400 rpm fast scsi on a
now discontinued adapter (the BT946) beats current UDMA IDE for real world
compiles. You "think". I've "measured"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
