[3638] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: ncr53c875 (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Bottomley)
Mon Apr 6 17:38:21 1998
To: groudier@club-internet.fr
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu,
fw@fwconsult.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Apr 1998 20:36:35 +0200."
<Pine.LNX.3.95.980406201514.375A-100000@localhost>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 16:29:33 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@columbiasc.ncr.com>
Gerard,
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com said:
> I looked at the changes to the NCR drivers in 2.1.92, and after having
> studing them quite a bit, there should be zero change in behavior in
> 2.1.92 on PC hardware at all. All of the changes made it work on the
> alpha, and changed port address manipulations to use a long type
> instead of an int.
I looked them over too. I notice in the appended message from Francios (which
you didn't translate) that he said 2.1.91 was working correctly. It seems to
me that this is probably the culprit:
@@ -9448,7 +9459,7 @@
/*
* Try to fix up PCI config according to wished features.
*/
-#if defined(__i386__) && !defined(MODULE)
+#if defined(__i386) && !defined(MODULE)
if ((driver_setup.pci_fix_up & 1) &&
(chip->features & FE_CLSE) && cache_line_size == 0) {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < LinuxVersionCode(2,1,75)
__i386 is not defined by the compiler, only __i386__. Could Francois try
reversing just this part of the patch?
James Bottomley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
