[1267] in linux-net channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IP Masquerading (was: LAN--inet & dynamic IP addressing)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael H. Warfield)
Fri Oct 27 20:42:49 1995

To: lim@csua.berkeley.edu (Lincoln Myers)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 11:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>
Cc: linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <199510262351.QAA27640@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> from "Lincoln Myers" at Oct 26, 95 04:51:43 pm

Lincoln Myers enscribed thusly:
> 
> Bernd S. Bentrup (bsb@uni-muenster.de) mentions the following magic words:
> 
> > small LAN at home ... connected ... dialup PPP ... don't have
> > registered IP address ... Socks package requires recompiling
> > and doesn't support UDP ...
> 
> This looks like a job for IP Masquerading!
> 
> I've written a short man page on masquerading, available from
> 
> 	ftp://ftp.csua.berkeley.edu/pub/lim/masquerading.4

	Oh oh...  Not found.  :-(

	Was that URL maybe suppose to be this:

	ftp://ftp.csua.berkeley.edu/pub/lim/masquerade.4

	Found that.  :-)

> Please oh please oh please, anyone who knows about masquerading and
> firewalling read it and tell me if anything is wrong...

	Will see...  Will let you know...

> Note that masquerading requires a 1.3.x kernel and ipfw, the latter of
> which comes with very recent (beta) net-tools.  Last I was told,
> net-tools could be found at
> 
> 	ftp://ftp.inka.de/pub/Linux/networking/net-tools/
> 
> ipfwadm, a better ipfw, might have support for masquerading in the
> future (I'm just about to submit changes):
> 
> 	ftp://ftp.xos.de/pub/linux/ipfwadm/

	Now this would be nice.  Lack of masquerading is the only thing
keeping me from even looking at the new ipfwadm.

> Lincoln

	Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post