[10070] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Testoril - Secrets to perfect female satisfaction! 71675797

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Testoril)
Sat Mar 15 20:07:24 2014

Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:07:21 -0700
From: "Testoril" <Testoril@raiseable.com>
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu

------=Part.294.69.1394928441
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Drive your partner crazy in bed tonight!

http://www.raiseable.com/l/lt24CHTL4501F136AQWCAG/290OI1162SQHW4094CMW10CC71675797JXR1297182344









Unsub- http://www.raiseable.com/l/lc10ENIJ4501J136MNQIBV/290KU1162UNUB4094CDT10VN71675797SXA1297182344











id they worry about attempts by 
the federal government to restrict or ban the sale of some weapons 
 or even confiscate them.Holder said in his letter that federal law 
enforcement agencies will "continue to execute their duties to enforce all 
federal firearms laws and regulations."Moreover, the United States will 
take all appropriate action, including litigation if necessary, to prevent 
the State of Kansas from interfering with the activities of federal officials 
enforcing federal law," Holder wrote.
get said many 
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable 
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine 
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards 
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The 
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with 
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between 
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's 
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far 
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5 
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all 
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those 
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often 
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits 
of additional reductions "speculative."

------=Part.294.69.1394928441
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.raiseable.com/l/lt18FBBW4501H136TAVHSH/290LQ1162RGLH4094HII10WD71675797YUJ1297182344"><H3>Drive your partner crazy in bed tonight!</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<center><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; font-size: 10px;">
If you can't read or see this e-mail. <a href="http://www.raiseable.com/l/lt18FJJA4501D136NKEWKB/290HD1162KLPT4094LJQ10UV71675797HPB1297182344" target="_blank">Click here</a> or enable image viewing on your browser.</span></center>
<br>

<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
  <tr>
    <td><div align="center"><a href="http://www.raiseable.com/l/lt18VQCJ4501E136JGOMPF/290ON1162AXQI4094ICB10FQ71675797KXT1297182344" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.raiseable.com/im/HUD4501WXESOJ136FUU/290LLHD1162RX4094QTXKF10HOGOF71675797S1297182344/img013629043.png"  width="604" height="603" border="0" style="display:block;"></a></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#666666; font-size: 10px;"><br>
  <a href="http://www.raiseable.com/l/lc4MBAJ4501F136YHLUYU/290AV1162RLIC4094RCA10KV71675797YUB1297182344" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a><br><br>
      <br>

Premium Nutraceuticals, LLC 4816 Technology Dr. Martinez, GA 30907

</span></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.raiseable.com/unsIKJWPC4501LRC136X/290YE1162HKY4094IIBF10AO71675797NC1297182344" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.raiseable.com/im/GPF4501RNGMRQ136JUP/290TDQY1162GG4094OKMER10EUXTO71675797O1297182344/img213629043.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> 
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> law took effect, and the U.S. 
attorney's office for Kansas released it Thursday."Kansas may not prevent 
federal employees and officials from carrying out their official responsibilities," 
Holder wrote in his letter. "And a state certainly may not criminalize 
the exercise of federal responsibilities."Patricia Stoneking, president 
of the Kansas State Rifle Association, said gun rights supporters were prepared 
for such a response from President Barack Obama's administration. The president 
has sought new gun control measures since December's deadly mass elementary 
school shooting in Newtown, Conn.The Republican governor is a gun rights 
supporter, and the measure passed the GOP-dominated Legislature by wide 
margins. Kobach also is a Republican."I think the people of Kansas are 
going to back this up," Stoneking said. "Probably thousands of grass-roots 
citizens are all in."Brownback said in his letter to Holder: "The right 
to keep and bear arms is a right that Kansans hold dear."The 
governor added, "The people of Kansas have repeatedly and overwhelmingly 
reaffirmed their commitment to protecting this fundamental right."The Kansas 
law is modeled on a 2009 Montana law that is being reviewed 
by a federal appeals court, and Alaska lawmakers approved a similar measure 
last month. Alabama, Missouri and Oklahoma lawmakers are considering similar 
legislation.Supporters of the Kansas law softened it  to say that federal 
agents wouldn't be arrested or 
 May 3, 2013: President Obama delivers a speech at the Anthropology Museum 
in Mexico City, Mexico.APIn Washington, it may seem like Congress has moved 
beyond gun control.After Democrats' highly touted background check bill 
was defeated in a Senate procedural vote last month, lawmakers immediately 
turned their attention to other matters, like immigration legislation, the 
budget and -- in light of the Boston terror attack -- security.But 
President Obama and his allies do not plan to let up, with 
Vice President Biden reportedly preparing to launch a new push for gun 
legislation and Obama's campaign arm trying to enlist the public to support 
the cause.As opponents of stricter gun laws rallied Friday in Texas for 
the National Rifle Association's annual convention, Obama himself used a 
speech during his visit to Mexico to once again sound the call 
for new regulations."Most of the guns used to commit violence here in 
Mexico come from the United States," Obama told the crowd. "I think 
many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual 
right to bear arms. And as president, I swore an oath to 
uphold that right, and I always will. But at the same time, 
as I've said in the United States, I will continue to do 
everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms that keep guns out 
of the hands of criminals and dangerous people."That can save lives here 
in Mexico and back home in the United States," he said.While an 
inordina
</p>
</html>

------=Part.294.69.1394928441--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post