[109045] in Cypherpunks
Re: Someone taking photos of my house today
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (me)
Tue Mar 9 13:16:11 1999
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 13:01:19 -0500
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
From: me <me@myplace.to>
Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
In-Reply-To: <v03130306b30a01dd878a@[209.66.100.86]>
Reply-To: me <me@myplace.to>
At 02:57 PM 3/8/99 -0800, you wrote:
>
>I grabbed a pair of 7 x 50 binoculars and watched to see what was going on.
>Three or four minutes after first appearing, a brown-bearded man got out,
>stood next to his car, and aimed what looked like an older-model 35mm
>camera at my house.
>
>(Older model because it was chrome, and most 35mm cameras today are black.
>Also, I saw no zoom lens. Maybe a minor zoom, e.g., up to 80 mm, but not
>noticeably a zoom.)
Actually, quite a few of the newest SLRs have matt finish stainless on the
faceplate. Also isn't there a recent CA law against viewing anothers
property with a "vision enhancing device"? A PI or LEO would be informed
and in compliance (at least for overt activities).
I'm not sure I'd be setting out the claymores but it might be prudent to be
a little more situation aware for a while.
>My speculation would be some kind of PI, private investigator. For what, I
>don't know. Hired by whom, I can't guess.
On the other hand it could just be another of those pesky advance men for
"Lifestyles of The Rich and Furious".
>--Tim May
Out of curiosity, is your property similarly observable from the sides or
back?
DLS
--------------------------------------------------------------------
