[944] in Release_7.7_team
Agenda, 5/6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Barker)
Mon May 5 16:08:50 1997
To: release-team@MIT.EDU
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 16:08:48 EDT
From: Mike Barker <mbarker@MIT.EDU>
e40-316, 12:30
1. Release Status (beta scheduled for 5/13)
- sgi open inventor?
- bert's olc fixes
- mtools
2. @sys links and sun4x_55 (see message below)
3. review draft release notes
4. roundtable
See you there
Mike
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 08:55:53 EDT
From: Dorothy Bowe <dot@MIT.EDU>
While I think of it, I would like to suggest a topic for next week's
meeting, namely @sys links. I have a list of lockers from previous
releases which "need" @sys links. The issue is that many of the lockers
work without adding new links, for they are not set up in a standard
way. e.g., the windowmanagers locker looks like this:
...
lrwxr-xr-x 1 3622 root 15 Feb 28 1995 sgi_52 -> arch/sgi_52/bin
lrwxr-xr-x 1 2133 root 15 Jul 15 1996 sgi_53 -> arch/sgi_53/bin
lrwxr-xr-x 1 2931 root 15 Apr 1 1995 sgibin -> arch/sgi_52/bin
lrwxr-xr-x 1 12264 root 12 Feb 15 1996 sun4bin -> bin/sun4m_53
lrwxr-xr-x 1 2885 root 7 Jul 13 1994 sun4m_53 -> sun4bin
lrwxr-xr-x 1 3622 root 7 Feb 28 1996 sun4m_54 -> sun4bin
drwxr-xr-x 2 8888 101 2048 Mar 28 1995 sun4osbin
lrwxr-xr-x 1 3698 root 6 Nov 19 1992 vax_bsd43 -> vaxbin
drwxrwxr-x 2 3382 13192 2048 Nov 6 1993 vaxbin
Do we want to add new sun4x_55 links, or does it matter? There's about
6-10 lockers in this category.
./dot
------- End of Forwarded Message
