[7468] in Release_7.7_team
Re: [release-team] Should we meet tomorrow?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan Reed)
Fri Apr 22 08:41:03 2011
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104211645580.2279@lunatique.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:40:52 -0400
Cc: "release-team@mit.edu Team" <release-team@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <3C5F2AC4-A237-45FA-90A5-0C45EC4DA25F@mit.edu>
To: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OK, let's go ahead and cancel.
-Jon
On Apr 21, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
> I can plan to deal with the things with my name next to them during the time we would be meeting :-)
>
> --
> Geoffrey Thomas
> geofft@mit.edu
>
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Jonathan Reed wrote:
>
>> We are scheduled to meet tomorrow, however I don't have a lot on the agenda other than a Trac review. Unless anyone feels strongly, I propose we cancel this week's meeting, check-in over e-mail on the issues listed below, and re-convene next Friday, April 29, at 2pm in N42-203.
>>
>> What do people think?
>>
>> -Jon
>>
>>
>>
>> Check-in required:
>>
>> geofft, lizdenys: dkms (#243)
>>
>> geofft: upgrade-schroots (#834)
>>
>> geofft,lizdenys: natty rebuild
>>
>> Trac #567: This doomed us with the latest gdm-config patch. I see a couple of suggestions in the comments, but nothing concrete. Can we move forward with a kludge, or are we dependent on upstream? And if we move forward, can we deploy code in a stub somewhere and source it elsewhere, to make changes easier?
>>
>> Trac #698: This requires a corrupted profile for testing. I can't reproduce anymore using the description Quentin provided.
>>
>>
>>
